Political Philosophy and Machiavelli Essay

I see that The Prince is an amoral accommodate. I think that when Machiavelli wrote it, he was in force(p) grievous the truth. He was just saying what he believed was right and what I believe is right. Some clocks the truth is non what raft penury to hear. Most of the time people motive to hear what is the nice or what they think the right thing is. The truth is that The Prince is the right course to be a leader. The wholly problem is that most people dont go. They think that a lot of the material Machiavelli has provided in this book is wrong and that he teaches the way to be in power the wrong way.Machiavelli says in The Prince that a prince should want to be both love and fe bed. He later says that being loved and feargond at the same time is extremely hard to do. So he says that if a prince should support to choose, he should choose being fe ard. There are probably a lot of people out there that disagree well-setly with him. His reasoning behind it was that if you are not feared past people could easily turn on you and overthrow you. A princes undivided goal is to not only become in power, but collar in power for as long as they can.Even if completely your people say that they love you, they could easily lie to you or just one day decide that they need a change. If that happens then they would not be afraid of attacking your throne. So if you, as a prince, are feared, no matter what the people think they wont rise against you. The biggest thing that Machiavelli said, was that a leader has to be more focused on appearing near(a) then being good. I completely agree with this statement, Machiavelli has the same reasoning that I do. One of Machiavellis biggest things in The Prince is that a leader must do whatever it takes to not only maintain power but stay in power.So period you are running for gloweringice you must appear to be a good candidate for the job. You have to tell the people what they want to hear. You have to do things for others that will make people look at you alike a good person. So if that means possibly lie to the people, then that is authorize in his eyes because you are doing what you need to do to get power. I think Machiavelli was very smart at saying some of these things. He understood that people only hear what they want to hear. So as a candidate trying to get power, you need to say what they want to hear.If you do that than voters will give you their attention. Politics is a game, it is now, and we know it was pole then when Machiavelli wrote this book. Machiavelli stressed to rulers to make sure that not only no one in your state takes your power, but no one alfresco your kingdom. He said to make sure that you have a strong military to protect your kingdom. You cant just have a strong military, you have to know how to use it overly. It is preferable to have your kingdom in a place where there are natural barriers.Barriers like having a mountain range around you or being located on a urine source. If there are mountains or water then your enemy has a much harder time reaching you, or you can see them coming and have time to react. He also stresses that if your kingdom does not have a natural barrier that you, as a ruler, should protect your kingdom the best you can by construction a barrier. Machiavelli was not only a smart man that wrote this book to rulers and future rulers. His advice was very effective back then and now in the present day. Many great leaders have based their ideas off of Machiavelli.One of the more recent American leaders is George W. Bush. Throughout his organization he showed many characteristics such as keeping his personal life on the down low and keeping his faith during his presidency. Bush was arrested for a DUI in 1976 but it was not talked about a lot while he was president. Bush was a very strong Christian, he believed that he was chosen by God to run for office. So he did a very good job keeping his faith. Machiavelli book , The Prince, was an amazing guide for totally rulers at the time and has been for the past hundreds of years.He did an amazing job of channelize them through every possible difficulty that they could have had during their rule. I real believe that if Machiavelli had not have written this book that the world would have been different then it is today. I think that this book has guided rulers that much. I am sure that there has been a lot of rulers out there that have turned to this book for advice. If this book was not there then these rulers might have made different decisions and possibly decisions that would have squeeze the whole world. So Machiavellis book has been a great slit for many rulers.