Gun control and the Constitution

The explanation of the warrant Amendment of the United States Constitution, which guarantees the decent of US citizens to bear arms is wiz of the most complex and controversial of every(prenominal) the developments within constitutional law that stool occurred in the last 230 years. In this phonograph record Cottrol attempts to bring together most of the major cases on the bit Amendment from the Supreme Court, and also includes variant articles on their meaning.One of the most valuable aspects of this book is the fact that Cottrol tackles his subject neither from the perspective of a supporter of the Amendment nor from a ordnance storeslinger control advocate. This balance is a r atomic number 18 achievement in a treatment of an aspect of the law that of decennium inspires resonantly social functionisan acquaintance that fails to offer the true complexity and difficulties involve with balancing the various parties knotted with the here and now Amendment. The book is d ivided into dickens main sections. The first gives copies of the two leading Supreme Court cases, Presser v. Illinois and United States v.Miller, as well as a state case that is now more than a ascorbic acid old provided still provides precedence Aymette v. State of Tennessee. Unlike many other books, Cottrol also provides the teeming texts of leading laws regarding gun control, such as the Brady Act and the 1986 Farm Owners Protection Act. These enable the reader to comp be mash cases, with the points of law that are raised within them, as well as the constitutional issues, with the actual laws that are now in place. Over each(prenominal) of them is the primary only if really over-riding language of the Second Amendment.In the second part of the book, Cottrol provides ten law and history scholarly articles which offer a stringently balanced view of the spectrum of views on the Second Amendment. Four out of the ten articles are actually challenging to the idea that the Sec ond Amendment is sacrosanct, while the hiatus are either historical or pro-Second Amendment in nature. Perhaps the outmatch section of the book is actually the Introduction, an extended contemplation of the various issues involved with gun control from the Revolutionary War on.Cottrol argues that the founding fathers saw that an gird citizenry was a necessary for the defence of political liberty that had l mavensome(prenominal) recently been won. However, the idea that America was (and still is) somehow intrinsically diametrical from other countries in its attitude towards gun is entirely stated rather than proven. Thus Cottrol argues that from the beginning, conditions in colonial America created a very several(predicate) attitude towards arms and the people (p. 13).But most European countries had a heavily armed populace in the Eighteenth and nineteenth centuries compared to to mean solar day, but have succeeded in developing into modern countries that do not have a gene rally armed citizenry, with associated more lower crime/murder rates. Cottrol offers an provoke view on a part of the gun control knock over that rarely ingestd much attention from either side. That is the fact that during the Nineteenth Century fears of insurrection from slaves (and then freed blacks) and Indians meant that there were out duty bans on these groups possessing arms.So the Second Amendment has already been suspended in the past for what are now regarded as spurious reasons should not similar suspensions be considered in the present day? Cottrol does not explicitly state this, but it is implicit within his admit scholarship that he in brief outlines within the Introduction to his book. In whiz of the most important aspects of the book, Cottrol argues that the collective businesss argument over whether the Second Amendment merely guarantees the right to bear arms for a small, trained militia (i. e. an army? ) is moot.He says that if both pro and anti- gun contr ol proponents accepted that there is a right to bear arms guaranteed in the Constitution then a genuinely productive conversation and dialogue could occur within association as to sensible limits to feeler to that right. Arguing metaphysically over whether the right exists or not is a rather futile exercise in sophistry. The more important argument is how the right should be instituted within fraternity what type of arms should be allowed under the constitution, what limits as to age, criminal history etc, should be placed?The right to bear arms, Cottrol suggests correctly, does not imply the right to bear all arms. For example, fully automatic machine guns have been misbranded for ordinary citizens in the United States since the 1930s. A person cannot but a bazooka, tank or fighter plane and claim that the Second Amendment nurses his right to purchase and use it. So the argument, Cottrol suggests, should be on the types of arms that are allowed, not whether they are to be al lowed at all. Here Cottrols hint that Federalist issues be more closely considered is very interesting.He correctly asserts that about 43 states already have laws and/or constitutions that touch in some authority or another upon the unfettered right to bear arms. This area of law, full of often contradictory of at least contrasting law, has yet to receive much scholarly attention. Cottrol implies that far more gun control may actually be occurring than those on the national level, arguing over theoretical constitutional matters, seem to understand. State matters may at times counterpoint with Federal authority, especially considering the existence of state militias versus the federal officially controlled national guard.Who actually controls national guard units became of great importance during the civil rights movement, when Southern states started to deny the validity of federal laws regarding desegregation. Presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy and Johnson all used federal troops in one way or another to help enforce federal court decisions. Cottrols book suggests that the strict constitutional arguments regarding the Second Amendment are in fact a fulcrum for much larger political, social and ethnical dilemmas within society.The scholarly articles which support the idea of gun control, and thus the diminish of Second Amendment rights , often seem to rely upon essentially pragmatic arguments gun control would lessen the amount and seriousness of violent crime. They imply that a tragic irony is now occurring in which the constitutional amendment designed to protect the country, and to make the citizens safer, have actually made the United States of America one of the most dangerous advanced industrialized countries in the world.The issue of guns and the Second Amendment seems to be rather tangential to the real problems according to Cottrol. He briefly mentions the country that is the most difficult for gun control advocates to explain Switzerland. The Swiss keep about 650,000 assault weapons in their private homes, making them by far the most armed/per capita population in the world. Yet Switzerland has near no violent crime. The country also has virtually no sorry people and few if any of the social problems that seem to lead to much of the gun violence in the United States.While Cottrols one intensity edition of what was previously a large three-volume work is by necessity limited in length, it is a pity that these wider issues surrounding the Second Amendment could not be considered. For example, the Brady Law, named after the Reagan official who was paralyzed by the man who to the highest degree assassinated President Reagan, was designed to stop the type of attack which had occurred there, but in fact does not really begin to tackle the problem.A person who wants to assassinate a President (or to shoot his wife) will find access to deadly weapons in any country in the world, whether it has no gun laws or a plentitude of them. The psychological problems associated with spree killers such as the Columbine killers cannot be tackled by gun control laws, nor can the economic hardship and desperation that seems to lead to much of the black-on-black violence that accounts for a legal age of murders. If Cottrol were to write another book on the wider implications of gun control these kinds of matters could be considered.Yet the book might still have a constitutional base as the US Constitution was not a theoretical inventory written as some kind of intellectual exercise but rather as a living framework on which a democratic country could grow. The argument over whether the US Constitution should be regarded as a living document that should be adapted to sure circumstances and even changed if necessary, or whether its power lies within a stringently originalist interpretation is at the heart of political debate today.One of the reasons that many of the world have an opinion on the constitutional arguments surround the Second Amendment is that they are, supposedly, simple to explain. Either the Constitution guarantees the right to bear arms or it does not. Cottrol suggests that this is in fact an irrelevant dichotomy it is how that right is controlled that is at the heart of the matter. In conclusion, weapon Control and the Constitution Sources and Explanations of the Second Amendment is an excellent book that raises a number of different perspectives on this important part of the US Constitution.Cottrols compendium of cases, opinion and scholarship suggests that a balanced approach to the various arguments should be adopted so that both sides can speak to one another rather than at or passed one another. ____________________________________ Works Cited Cottrol, Robert. Gun Control and the Constitution Sources and Explanations of the Second Amendment. Routledge, New York 1994. .